Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

12.06.2025 04:32

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Elden Ring Nightreign devs confirm they’re working on a duos mode - Polygon

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

PC: Google

Why do entitled people demand that I pick up after my doggo when he goes to the bathroom? Do they not know that doggy doo decomposes & feeds the plants?

Netflix and chill is a thing:

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

PC: Google…my precious!

Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 - TheStreet

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

What would happen if the US government told the British government in no uncertain terms all RAF bases with USAF personnel now must follow the Constitution and us law, and if the UK tried to defy this, the US military would directly attack the UK?

PC: The Guardian

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

There are some books that just…suck!

Scientists make jaw-dropping find after drilling more than 1,500 feet into Antarctic ice: 'We even discovered a school of lobster-like creatures' - The Cool Down

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

Have the ability to visualize:

Why do atheists love to preach against Abrahamic religions and mock God? Even if they do not fear the eternal fire of hell, pious Muslims will certainly not leave them alone and will take brutal revenge until they surrender and repent of their sins.

Entertainment.

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

What have you learned from your parents' mistakes?

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Why does everyone hate Anthony Joshua so much? I get that he isn’t the best heavyweight boxer ever but people claim he’s a no skill fighter but he has an Olympic gold medal, a world championship, and beat Klitschko, a dominant force in boxing

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

PC: Google

2 Jewish delis make the New York Times’ 2025 ‘Best Restaurants in New York City’ list - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

Fans slam Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford's message to "cost sensitive" fans - Eurogamer

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Because reading is WORK. Period.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

NYC summer stargazing seasons kicks off with triangle, meteor showers - Gothamist

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

PC: Google

What is the most popular song that includes the word "you"? Are there any other songs that use "you" multiple times?

PC: Google

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

Many if not most, are in this category.

Actually have some literary skill:

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.